















| 
| 


Second Annual Survey of Market Practitioners:
Questionnaire and Survey Results - Part One
Note: All responses given in percentages (%)
Overview
| With the creation of the Euro, foreign exchange (FX) activity diminished for the first time between April 1998 and April 2001, from an average daily turnover of $1,490 billion to $1,210 billion. |
- Will concerns with terrorism and geopolitical risk slow down financial globalization?
| 22
|
| Yes for all markets
|
| 23
|
| Yes for emerging markets
|
| 18
|
| Only for very specific markets
|
| 37
|
| No
|
- Do you believe that the global financial system has now developed the instruments and systems such as CLS (see box) to keep currency risks under control?
| 40
|
| Yes
|
| 60
|
| No
|
- Or are capital markets still highly vulnerable to mainly one of the following threats?
| 13
|
| Major misalignment between the key currencies (dollar, euro, yen, pound)
|
| 27
|
| Mismanagement and abrupt movements of second-tier currencies (Latin America, East Asia)
|
| 5
|
| Failure of the euro
|
| 20
|
| Disruptive speculation of major proportions by hedge funds and others
|
| 2
|
| Breakdown in the pipelines for FX movements
|
| 33
|
| Extreme volatility
|
- Do you think the implementation of a “Tobin tax” on FX transactions would:
| 5
|
| Protect the "real economy" from financial speculation
|
| 45
|
| Disrupt the efficiency of capital markets and penalize the real economy
|
| 50
|
| Be easily circumvented anyway
|
- Altogether, compared to one year ago, would you say that the risk of a major global financial crisis has:
| 42
|
| Increased
|
| 42
|
| Remained the same
|
| 16
|
| Decreased
|
| In 1995, a group of major FX trading banks (G20) developed Continuous Linked Settlement (CLS) as a solution to the problem of FX settlement risk. A "payment-versus-payment" scheme will be implemented in the second half of 2002 for all FX transactions of members. |
Part A: The risks for capital markets
1. Crises and wealth destruction
In the near future (next three years) how vulnerable are capital markets to the risk of another:
- "September 11" type of disruption in physical/human market systems
| 13
|
| Extremely vulnerable
|
| 58
|
| Vulnerable
|
| 27
|
| Less than before
|
| 2
|
| Not at all
|
- "Barings" type of operational malfunctioning
| 17
|
| Extremely vulnerable
|
| 61
|
| Vulnerable
|
| 20
|
| Less than before
|
| 2
|
| Not at all
|
- Argentinean ("peg-to-dollar" and debt overhang) type of crisis
| 10
|
| Extremely vulnerable
|
| 61
|
| Vulnerable
|
| 27
|
| Less than before
|
| 2
|
| Not at all
|
- Asian/Japanese type of "bad-loan crisis"
| 19
|
| Extremely vulnerable
|
| 56
|
| Vulnerable
|
| 25
|
| Less than before
|
| 0
|
| Not at all
|
- "Enron" type of opacity and bankruptcy
| 36
|
| Extremely vulnerable
|
| 56
|
| Vulnerable
|
| 7
|
| Less than before
|
| 1
|
| Not at all
|
- "e-bubble" type of speculative burst
| 5
|
| Extremely vulnerable
|
| 41
|
| Vulnerable
|
| 48
|
| Less than before
|
| 6
|
| Not at all
|
2. Barriers to cross-border capital flows: impact on risks?
-
Between major financial markets, the biggest barrier to cross-border activities are differences in:
| 8
|
| Technology and market infrastructures
|
| 13
|
| Financial information standards
|
| 25
|
| Regulation of markets and institutional investors
|
| 23
|
| Tax systems
|
| 27
|
| Market cultures and procedures
|
| 4
|
| Other
|
- To access emerging markets, the key obstacle is:
| 2
|
| The same as for major financial markets
|
| 31
|
| Lack of liquidity
|
| 16
|
| Local regulation on foreign investment
|
| 34
|
| Insufficient quality of financial information
|
| 11
|
| Other
|
| 7
|
| Not relevant for my activity
|
Continue to Questionnaire and Survey Results - Part Two.
top
|